Federal Judge Ruled Christian Prayers Unconstitutional in North Carolina County Board

By Isaiah Narciso
North Carolina Prayer Ruling
FILE: A federal court judge has issued a preliminary injunction ordering commissioners in North Carolina's Rowan County to halt their practice of opening government meetings with a prayer specific to one religion. (AP)

A federal judge in North Carolina has ruled that a county board in that state violated the Constitution when it conducted prayers that were of a Christian nature.

According to Chris Dyches of WNCN, the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit more than two years ago against the Rowan County Board of Commissioners. The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of North Carolina residents Nancy Lund, Liesa Montag-Siegel and Robert Voelker.

"There are those who will agree with me and those who don't," former commissioner Jon Barber wrote on Facebook after the federal ruling. "This legal ruling will not deter me from my Savior and Lord Jesus Christ."

Dyches reported that according to the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, more than 97 percent of board meetings between 2007 and 2013 opened with prayers that were generally Christian in nature. The federal ruling would make a June 2013 injunction permanent, which prohibited commissioners from opening their meetings with prayer "in the name of Jesus."

"The commissioners, who at the time delivered the prayers themselves, routinely called on Jesus Christ and refer to other sectarian beliefs during invocations," Dyches wrote. "Opening invocations have declared that 'there is only one way to salvation, and that is Jesus Christ,' as well as given thanks for the 'virgin birth,' the 'cross at Calvary,' and 'the resurrection.'"

In a news release, the ACLU argued that the Commissioners' prayer practice was "coercive" in nature and just advanced the "sectarian" Christian faith.

"I'm very glad that the court agrees that Rowan County and other local governments should work to be welcoming to residents of all beliefs, and not simply those who share the majority view," Lund said. "Rowan County is home to people of many different beliefs, and I think our officials should embrace that diversity and make public meetings as inclusive as possible."

U.S. District Judge James Beaty elaborated on the details behind his ruling.

"The Board's practice fails to be nondiscriminatory, entangles government with religion, and over time, establishes a pattern of prayers that tends to advance the Christian faith of the elected Commissioners at the expense of any religious affiliation unrepresented by the majority," Beaty wrote.

Beaty pointed out the differences between Rowan County's prayer practice and another in Greece, New York. Unlike Rowan County, the New York town invited clergy and laypersons to deliver prayers in a nondiscriminatory fashion according to ACLU.

"While an all-comers policy is not necessarily required, a nondiscriminatory one is," Beaty wrote. "When all faiths but those of the five elected Commissioners are excluded, the policy inherently discriminates and disfavors religious minorities."

Chris Brook, legal director for the ACLU-NCLF, praised the judge's decision.

"Residents attending public meetings should not have to choose between participating in a religious exercise led by a government official and singling themselves out as a religious minority," Brook said. "The message of today's decision is clear: Rowan County's prayer practice unconstitutionally discriminated against many of its residents, alienating many who simply wanted to play a role in local decision-making."

The ACLU has posted the entire court ruling on its website.

    Most Popular
  • Is 'The Last Supper' worth watching? Audience and critics weigh in

    Is 'The Last Supper' worth watching? Audience and critics weigh in

    Faith-based films often receive mixed reactions, and The Last Supper is no exception. The movie attempts to bring a fresh perspective to one of the most iconic moments in Christian history, but does it succeed? Some reviews from critics and audiences provide insight into its strengths and shortcomings.

  • ‘The Chosen’ Season 5: The darkest season yet—What to know before watching

    The wait is over—The Chosen is back with its fifth season, and this time, things are getting intense. The new episodes dive straight into the final days of Jesus’ life, covering some of the most emotional and dramatic moments in the Bible. If you’ve been following the series, you already know that The Chosen isn’t just about retelling familiar stories—it’s about bringing them to life in a way that feels real.

  • Massacres in Syria: Over 1,000 dead, including Christians and Alawites

    Syria’s coastal regions have been devastated by a series of massacres, with reports indicating that over 1,000 people—many from Christian and Alawite communities—have been killed in brutal attacks. Entire families have been wiped out, and survivors are fleeing in search of safety as sectarian violence escalates.

  • Kim Sae-ron and Wheesung: The tragic irony of Korean society and the principles of happiness

    Not long ago, the media was in an uproar over actress Kim Sae-ron’s passing. Just months before, the same people who had relentlessly criticized her for her DUI incident were now expressing sympathy, saying, "The world was too harsh on her." The irony is impossible to ignore.

  • Newsboys move forward as a quartet after Michael Tait’s departure

    After more than a decade as the lead singer of the Newsboys, Michael Tait has officially parted ways with the band, marking a significant shift in the Christian rock group’s lineup. The remaining members—Jeff Frankenstein, Jody Davis, Duncan Phillips, and Adam Agee—have assured fans that they will continue forward, embracing a new season of music and ministry.

Top Stories