The Truth About Civil Unions

“Civil union is a gay 'marriage' by another name, and puts God fearing people in the position of having to choose between God and Caesar.”

Four years ago, when Vermont came out for “civil unions,” the majority of Americans avidly opposed the idea. However, as the battle to protect traditional marriage took full force in recent weeks, Americans began reconsidering the issue they once solidly rejected.

The recent Gallup poll released on March 11 reflected this change; 54% of Americans now favor legalizing civil unions as an alternative to same-sex “marriage.” Just last year, 57% opposed it.

''People may be rethinking whether civil unions are a responsible alternative to gay marriage amid all the hullabaloo,'' says Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.

According to pro-family groups, the acceptance of civil unions is a direct effect of the public’s misunderstanding of the meaning of a civil union.

“Civil union is a gay 'marriage' by another name,” said Robert Knight, Director of the culture and family institute. “Americans don’t understand why civil unions pose just as great a threat as gay 'marriage.'”

“When they understand that this is a counterfeit marriage by another name they oppose it,” said Knight, a strongly rooted evangelical Christian. “Civil unions pose a danger to freedom and children, because they are posed on everyone in society.”

“By this I mean that the law requires everyone to affirm homosexuality,” continued Knight. “This puts God fearing people in the position of having to choose between God and Caesar.”

Churches also would be harmed should civil unions pass in the States.

“Civil unions also lead to the idea of civil marriage becoming all inclusive institution. While this may sound like it could keep everybody happy, it will ghettoize the church and it will push real marriage into a corner,” said Knight. “Churches eventually will be told that if they insist on limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples, they will lose their tax-exempt status, because the religion of equality trumps real religious freedom in a system populated by liberal judges.”

Therefore, according to Knight, “states should strengthen their marriage laws to ensure that civil unions aren’t created.”

Additionally, Knight, one of the original drafters of the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, which defines marriage as a union between man and woman for all federal purposes, called for a strongly worded constitutional amendment to protect marriage.

“We should move toward a constitutional amendment that protects marriage not only in name, but in essence,” said Knight. “We would favor strengthening the language of the current federal marriage amendment, because right now, it practically invites states to have civil unions.”

In terms of the current debate in Massachusetts, where legislators are scurrying to protect traditional marriage before May 17th, when the state clerks are set to issue licenses to homosexuals under the orders of the Masschusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Knight urged Governor Mitt Romney (R) to step in.

“Governor Mitt Romney has a wonderful opportunity to become a national hero. He could do this by ordering clerks not to issue same-sex marriage licenses on the grounds that the law has not been changed just because the Massachusetts Supreme judicial court said it didn’t like it. It is still up to the legislature to enact the laws,” said Knight.

Governor Romney, on March 11 said he approved of a proposed amendment put forward by Mass. House Speaker Thomas Finneran that proposed a full legal ban on gay marriage without mention of possible civil unions.

Since then, Finneran has teamed up with senate leader Robert Travaglini to sponsor an amenmdent that protects marriage that also creates civil union.

Pro-family groups are working to defeat that and to try to pass a clean amendment protecting marriage.

    Most Popular
  • Is 'The Last Supper' worth watching? Audience and critics weigh in

    Is 'The Last Supper' worth watching? Audience and critics weigh in

    Faith-based films often receive mixed reactions, and The Last Supper is no exception. The movie attempts to bring a fresh perspective to one of the most iconic moments in Christian history, but does it succeed? Some reviews from critics and audiences provide insight into its strengths and shortcomings.

  • ‘The Chosen’ Season 5: The darkest season yet—What to know before watching

    The wait is over—The Chosen is back with its fifth season, and this time, things are getting intense. The new episodes dive straight into the final days of Jesus’ life, covering some of the most emotional and dramatic moments in the Bible. If you’ve been following the series, you already know that The Chosen isn’t just about retelling familiar stories—it’s about bringing them to life in a way that feels real.

  • Massacres in Syria: Over 1,000 dead, including Christians and Alawites

    Syria’s coastal regions have been devastated by a series of massacres, with reports indicating that over 1,000 people—many from Christian and Alawite communities—have been killed in brutal attacks. Entire families have been wiped out, and survivors are fleeing in search of safety as sectarian violence escalates.

  • Kim Sae-ron and Wheesung: The tragic irony of Korean society and the principles of happiness

    Not long ago, the media was in an uproar over actress Kim Sae-ron’s passing. Just months before, the same people who had relentlessly criticized her for her DUI incident were now expressing sympathy, saying, "The world was too harsh on her." The irony is impossible to ignore.

  • Newsboys move forward as a quartet after Michael Tait’s departure

    After more than a decade as the lead singer of the Newsboys, Michael Tait has officially parted ways with the band, marking a significant shift in the Christian rock group’s lineup. The remaining members—Jeff Frankenstein, Jody Davis, Duncan Phillips, and Adam Agee—have assured fans that they will continue forward, embracing a new season of music and ministry.