U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Texas Late-Term Abortion Law

By Lauren Leigh Noske
TexasHousePassesAbortionBill.jpg
Texas State Representative Jason Villalba holds a sonogram of his thirteen-week-old son taken last week as he offers closing remarks during a meeting of the state legislature to consider legislation restricting abortion rights in Austin, Texas July 9, 2013. The Texas House of Representatives approved the bill on Tuesday that would mandate sweeping abortion restrictions, including a ban on most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy and tougher standards for abortion clinics. REUTERS/Mike Stone

The United States Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Texas House Bill 2 provisions which require abortion doctors to have admitting privileges in nearby hospitals are constitutional. Planned Parenthood appealed to the Supreme Court after being defeated in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals by a unanimous ruling earlier this month

House Bill 2 prohibits clinics from performing abortions on babies after 20 weeks, requires that abortion doctors have admitting privileges in hospitals within 30 miles of clinics, and necessitates that abortion clinics meet ambulatory surgical center standards of care for their patients. The late-term abortion law has had quite a controversial history - from a 12-hour filibuster by Texas Senator Wendy Davis which, when combined with an unruly pro-abortion mob, effectively stalled the bill in the first special session of congress, to being challenged with federal lawsuits by abortion providers once the bill finally passed in the Texas legislature.

Planned Parenthood brought the provision of the bill which requires that doctors have admitting privileges in nearby hospitals to court, claiming that the stipulation was unreasonable and would cause several of their Texas clinics to close. Judge Lee Yeakel ruled in their favor, but her ruling was unanimously overturned when Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott appealed to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. Planned Parenthood then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and lost their battle Tuesday with a 5-4 vote in support of the new Texas law.

The Supreme Court determined that it is constitutional for the state to require House Bill 2's higher standards of health care, even if doing so might "increase the cost of accessing an abortion provider and decrease the number of physicians available to perform abortions." According to Fox News, twelve abortion clinics have already shut down in Texas because they did not meet the new requirements.

While the court case will likely continue until January, the new late-term abortion law is in effect. "Texas is on the verge of a decisive legal Pro-Life victory," says Elizabeth Graham, director of the Texas Right to Life organization. The portion of the bill prohibiting late-term abortions was not challenged in court, they say, and they are celebrating the Supreme Court's decision - "While this ruling could eventually be reversed, in the meantime, abortion clinics will stay closed, which means that pregnant women and babies will be spared from abortion." Planned Parenthood claims that as many as 20,000 women will be prevented from having abortions because of the provisions in House Bill 2.

Governor Rick Perry released a statement Tuesday regarding the U.S. Supreme Court ruling - "This is good news both for the unborn and for the women of Texas, who are now better protected from shoddy abortion providers operating in dangerous conditions," he said - "As always, Texas will continue doing everything we can to protect the culture of life in our state."

  • [Exclusive Interview] A revelation within the brink of life and death — Meg Leung’s mission in Christian art

    Meg Leung (梁麗橋), an artist with a lifelong love for watercolor painting, sees her art as more than a means of expressing her inner world; it is a bridge connecting her to God. Her artistic journey has revealed God’s perfect plan and inspired her to communicate the power of faith through her wor

  • Transgenderism a fundamental human right? Hong Kong public disagrees, survey finds

    A 2024 survey from the Society for Truth and Light (明光社)'s Center for Life and Ethics Research reveals that respondents from various backgrounds prioritize personal safety and fairness when it comes to transgender issues. When laws involve moral judgments, most respondents believe courts should not make the decisions. The study also indicates that religious believers share similar views with non-religious respondents, reflecting that many churches may rarely address gender topics in depth.

  • Discipleship and Evangelism: Walking the Path of the Great Commission

    Like an ever-flowing spring, the gospel refreshes dry, parched lands and needs our unwavering passion and steadfast faith to transform lives and bring renewal. The "flame in our hearts" calls Christians to keep their faith and love for the Lord ablaze, representing the work and power of the Holy Spirit, driving us to proclaim God's glory boldly.

  • North America Chinese Evangelical Seminary year-end report highlights significant ministry progress

    As the year draws to a close, Rev. James Liu, President of the Chinese Evangelical Seminary North America (CESNA), reflected on the seminary’s remarkable growth and ministry development over the past year. Dedicated to providing theological education to Chinese Christians, CESNA continues to uphold its mission to remain faithful to the gospel and nurture believers. This year’s achievements span academic, ministerial, and outreach endeavors, fostering spiritual growth and advancing missionary wo